About Us

Who

We’re former finance and policy staff from mid-sized and large municipalities, and the Ontario Government

John Innes
Emily Harris

We’re long time tax and fintech service suppliers for Canada’s local public sector

Jeff Oberman
Bill Spittle

We got together because we noticed trends in municipal finance around uncertainty, pressure to ‘do more with less’ and an expense focus that we thought enabling financial rules and a systematic view of revenue could balance out.

Team bios ordered from left to right, top to bottom

What

Translating Council priorities into user-friendly finance policies and new streams of revenue

Finance Policy Services

  1. Assess Existing Finance Policy

  2. Draft New Finance Policy

Revenue Services

  1. Non-tax Revenue Options for Budget Consideration (“Money Now”)

  2. Review Revenue Profile

Why

Because around the world,
government power is decentralizing.

The trend is especially pronounced in Commonwealth countries, and it appears to be taking hold in Canada too:

  • Nunavut was established (1999);

  • Indigenous governments’ jurisdiction over child and family services was recognised (2019);

  • In 2023, increasing subnational autonomy is a priority for provinces outside Quebec; and

  • Having localised service provision, provincial governments don’t have the ‘on-the-ground’ presence or delivery capacity they once did in many communities.

Why local?

Local governments elsewhere have benefitted from the shifting scale of authority and program delivery;
will Canadian municipalities?

Which elected officials and professional staff will take the lead?

With municipalities as service providers, coordinating bodies or governments?

Although the conditions are favourable, it’s not clear yet what the people who run municipalities will make of the moment. That’s why local: Something is bubbling here, right below the surface.

Why policy and revenue?

Governments have four powers to steer society:
Tax, spend, inform and regulate.

  1. Municipalities tend to focus on two, service provision (spend) and, to a lesser extent, inform, so we focus on the other two, regulation (policy-making) and taxation (revenue generation).

    [ Why financial policy? ]

    It backstops mistaking motion for progress: The sector’s front-line service delivery focus can crowd out ‘back-office’ priorities like creating internal structure and a balanced, deliberate revenue landscape, which is understandable; municipalities can survive without them. But they don’t thrive.

    It’s a soft spot: Budget theatrics and incoherent financial decision-making mixed with intermittent fiscal crises have been a drag on public perceptions about whether municipalities can manage public money well enough to be trusted with more of it.

    For a sector that tends to understand its purpose in terms of service delivery, the capacity to do more can get collapsed with the capacity to spend more. The phrase ‘do more with less’ usually refers to budget expectations - more output with less input.

  2. Impact is about more than how much cash is in the bank.

    By focusing on financial policy and non-tax revenue, we highlight opportunities to impact communities that don’t depend on the size of a municipality’s balances, but on its Council’s willingness to plan by committing to policy and lead change with proposals to increase revenue.

When

The Policy Shop’s predecessor was established in 2012. In 2018, it was incorporated as Policy Shop Inc..

Where

Based in Ontario, most of our clients are Ontario municipalities and local government associations. (Click here to see who.)

Our work has been featured in presentations to Councils across North America, translated into multiple languages and our company was recognized in Corporate Vision’s 2023 Canadian Business Awards as Best Finance Policy Office - Ontario.

Web Visitors

Company Footprint

Contact

Office

50 Carroll St., Toronto, M4M 3G3